MINUTES OF CAPE SPECIAL EXECUTIVE MEETING
March 11, 2005
Present: J. Aggrey (Chairperson), D. Brackley, T. Furmanczyk, H. Hao, M. Korol, J. Mrenica, B. McVicar, R. Oslund, A. Picotte, P Rosen, A. Sipos, S. Spak , C. Therrien, C. Danik, D. Martin.
Apologies: None
The meeting was convened in order to discuss the strategy and steps for a dues increase.
It was moved by J. Aggrey, seconded by P. Rosen, that the National Executive Committee exercise its authority to ensure that ACEP-CAPE continues to exist.
In favour – 11, Opposed = 0, Abstention = 1. Carried.
It was moved by D. Brackley, seconded by A. Sipos, that the Association endeavour to maintain, at least, the current level of services in formulating a dues increase.
In favour – 10, Opposed = 1, Abstention = 1. Carried.
It was moved by P. Rosen, seconded by C. Therrien, that the proposed timeframes be adopted in principle.
In favour – 11, Opposed = 0, Abstention = 0. Carried.
There was a consensus that Scenarios 1 and 3 be dropped and that Scenario 2 was the preferred choice of the Committee. It was agreed to include another scenario proposed by M. Korol and that this be included with all the remaining scenarios to be presented to the Local Leadership.
The meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m.
March 11, 2005
MINUTES OF CAPE SPECIAL EXECUTIVE MEETING
February 2, 2005
5:45 p.m.
National Office
Ottawa, Ontario
February 2, 2005
5:45 p.m.
National Office
Ottawa, Ontario
Present: J. Aggrey (Chairperson), D. Brackley, T. Furmanczyk, H. Hao, M. Korol, J. Mrenica, B. McVicar, R. Oslund, A. Picotte, P Rosen, A. Sipos, S. Spak , C. Therrien, C. Danik, D. Martin.
Apologies: None
The meeting was convened in order to discuss the strategy and steps for a dues increase.
It was moved by J. Aggrey, seconded by P. Rosen, that the National Executive Committee exercise its authority to ensure that ACEP-CAPE continues to exist.
In favour – 11, Opposed = 0, Abstention = 1. Carried.
It was moved by D. Brackley, seconded by A. Sipos, that the Association endeavour to maintain, at least, the current level of services in formulating a dues increase.
In favour – 10, Opposed = 1, Abstention = 1. Carried.
It was moved by P. Rosen, seconded by C. Therrien, that the proposed timeframes be adopted in principle.
In favour – 11, Opposed = 0, Abstention = 0. Carried.
There was a consensus that Scenarios 1 and 3 be dropped and that Scenario 2 was the preferred choice of the Committee. It was agreed to include another scenario proposed by M. Korol and that this be included with all the remaining scenarios to be presented to the Local Leadership.
The meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m.